I’ve been waiting for a product like this for some time.

A proven strategy that WORKS...

We all know that there are various “make money loopholes” or “push button software’s” available to buy that have the ability to generate you money online, but there’s nothing better than a proven strategy that works. A detailed step by step guide which takes you from struggling to make a cent, to earning commission on autopilot for months on end.

Google Sniper by George Brown is exactly that, and it’s a system that will take you through finding a niche, discovering high volume targeted keywords, picking a product to promote to setting up your WordPress site and getting in indexed by Google. It really is the most foolproof system available.

Not only is it a well taught course anyone can learn, the strategy actually kicks ass! It takes you on average about 2-4 hours to create a Sniper site, and this includes everything from researching a niche to finding a product to promote (if you follow the steps correctly). After this, it really is all systems go...

As people we all value time over money right? Well a strategy that generates you a good deal of money but takes you 16 hours a day to operate isn't a good one. Yes you’ll make money, but you won’t have any time to enjoy that money. But Google Sniper really makes you commission on autopilot. It takes on average 2-4 hours to set up, and then you simply can just relax. Why?

There’s no traffic generation involved!

● No PPC
● No Link Building
● No Social Media - No Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr or anything or that sort
● No CPA
● No More Spending Time On Months Of Content Either...

It’s an awesome strategy, and it’s easy to learn.

Google Sniper 2.0 really is a must for anyone looking to make money online. The 104-page eBook guides you through the process, and is reinforced by the step-by-step walk-through videos. The monthly option of Sniper X also keeps everything up to date, and gives you even more strategies and tactics to make more money from your sniper sites. But that choice is optional...

So with more success stories generated than any other make money online strategy? It’s a no brainer; check it out here -Google Sniper 2.0 

The Complete Guide to Affiliate Marketing on the Web By Brown, Bruce C
Affiliate Program Management By Prussakov, Evgenii 

             

The federal bankruptcy act contains several important terms. One such term is "insider." The term is used in connection with preferences and preferential transfers. Which among the following is not an "insider"?

The federal bankruptcy act contains several important terms. One such term is "insider." The term is used in connection with preferences and preferential transfers. Which among the following is not an "insider"?

A secured creditor is not an "insider" for the purposes of a preferential transfer. 

One of the elements necessary to establish that a preferential transfer has been made under the bankruptcy code by the debtor to a creditor is that the

One of the elements necessary to establish that a preferential transfer has been made under the bankruptcy code by the debtor to a creditor is that the

Under the bankruptcy ac, one of the elements which must be established in proving that a preferential transfer was made is that the debtor was insolvent at the time of the transfer. The bankruptcy act, presumes that the debtor is insolvent  during the 90 days prior to the date the petition was filed. 

In a bankruptcy proceeding, the trustee

In a bankruptcy proceeding, the trustee

A trustee is the representative of the estate and has the capacity to sue and be sued. 

The trustee in bankruptcy of a landlord-debtor under chapter 7 liquidation.

The trustee in bankruptcy of a landlord-debtor under chapter 7 liquidation.

The trustee may assign the leases of the landlord-debtor if such action is considered to be in the best interest of the debtor's estate. The trustee's duty is to acquire as many assets as possible for distribution to the creditors who filed claims in the bankruptcy proceeding. 

Haplow engaged Turnbow as his attorney when threatened by several creditors with a bankruptcy proceeding. Haplow's assets consisted of $85,000 and his debts were $125,000. A petition was subsequently was filed and uncontested. Several of the creditors are concerned the the suspected large legal fees charged by Turnhow will diminish the size of the distributable estateh. What are the rules of limitation which apply to such fees?

Haplow engaged Turnbow as his attorney when threatened by several creditors with a bankruptcy proceeding. Haplow's assets consisted of $85,000 and his debts were $125,000. A petition was subsequently was filed and uncontested. Several of the creditors are concerned the the suspected large legal fees charged by Turnhow will diminish the size of the distributable estate. What are the rules of limitation which apply to such fees?

According to the rules of bankruptcy procedure, it is necessary to file a proof of claims against the debtor's estate. The filling must be timely (within a 6-month period) or the claim will be barred. A claim that is filled on time is given prima facie validity and is approved unless there is an objection by one of the creditors. The filling would include a statement of compensation paid or agreed. 

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 lists several sanctions for offering bribes, kickbacks, etc.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 lists several sanctions for offering bribes, kickbacks, etc.  While this is the rule for accounting in the United States, other countries have no such laws.  How does the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) compensate for this inconsistency in accounting rules, if at all?  How would you compensate for this difference in accounting standards?  Do you believe that allowing bribes, kickbacks, etc. is necessarily unethical?

The Foreign Corrup Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977 was establish to deter bribes to political officials outside of the United State and to make it a requirement for all public companies to fairly reflect financial activity and maintain reasonable records and properly recording of transactions (p.568). Other than the ISBA issuing ISA No. 1 "Presentation of Financial Statements" and IAS No. 34, "Interim Financial Reporting", the IASB does not have any ruling or regulations for bribery or kickbacks. If it were up to me, to avoid such kickbacks or briberies of foreign officials I would have the ISBA adopt a law similar to FCPA. I doubt that it would go through, since they allow the individual nations to enforce IAS No. 34 or the frequency of reporting to be decided by the each countries national law. 
If bribes or kickbacks were not view as unethical, then there would not be any need for the FCPA. I think that both the company and the individual(s) involved in the bribes are unethical, they are the only ones benefiting from these acts. Let's take a major shoe company going into a third world nation, they offer the governent official a large quantity of cash and incentives for the ability to establish a plant in the country, who will benefit? The individual and the shoe company. Either will claim that they have people working, but they are working for pennies a day. Yet the official enjoys perks and lots of money, while they company will sell the cheap shoes for hundreds of dollars. The bribe and kickback is very unethical.